Hållbar digitalisering 2021 – referenser

Denna referenslista innehåller ett urval av de källor som behandlats under presentationer och diskussioner under konferensen.

Aubert, B. A., Patry, M. & Rivard, S. (1998) Assessing the risk of IT outsourcing, In Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Volume VI, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, pp. 685-692.
https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1998.654830

Avropa.se (2021) Programvarulösningar, Statens inköpscentral.
https://www.avropa.se/ramavtal/ramavtalsomraden/it-och-telekom/Programvaror-och-tjanster/programvarulosningar/ (Senast ändrad: 2021-08-03)

Arvidsson Pape, L., Lindström, L. & Westerlund, G. (Eds.) (2020) Praktiska erfarenheter kring e-underskrifter, Version 1.0, 23 juni.
https://sambruk.se/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Sambruks-n%C3%A4tverk-Praktiska-erfarenheter-kring-e-signering.pdf

Blind, K. & Böhm, M. (2019) The Relationship Between Open Source Software and Standard Setting, Thumm, N. (Ed.) EUR 29867 EN, JRC (Joint Research Centre) Science for Policy Report, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2019, ISBN 978-92-76-11593-9.
https://dx.doi.org/10.2760/163594

Butler, S., Gamalielsson, J., Lundell, B., Brax, C., Mattsson, A., Gustavsson, T., Feist, J. & Lönroth, E. (2020) Maintaining Interoperability in Open Source Software: A Case Study of the Apache PDFBox Project, Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 159.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.110452

Butler, S., Gamalielsson, J., Lundell, B., Brax, C. Sjöberg, J., Mattsson, A., Gustavsson, T., Feist, J., & Lönroth, E. (2021) On Company Contributions to Community Open Source Software Projects, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 47(7), pp. 1381-1401.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2019.2919305

DIGG (2020) Analys av DIGG:s policy för utveckling av programvara, Myndigheten för digital förvaltning, 3 juni.
https://www.digg.se/om-oss/nyheter/2020/analys-av-diggs-policy-for-utveckling-av-programvara

EC (2012) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2012) 529 final, Unleashing the Potential of Cloud Computing in Europe, SWD(2012) 271 final, 27 Sep., European Commission.
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2012:0529:FIN:EN:PDF

EC (2013) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Against lock-in: building open ICT systems by making better use of standards in public procurement, COM(2013) 455 final, Guide for the procurement of standards-based ICT – Elements of Good Practice, SWD(2013) 224 final, 25 Jun., European Commission.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52013SC0224&from=EN

EDPB (2020) Frequently Asked Questions on the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-311/18 – Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Ltd and Maximillian Schrems, European Data Protection Board, 23 July.
https://edpb.europa.eu/sites/edpb/files/files/file1/20200724_edpb_faqoncjeuc31118_en.pdf

Egyedi, T. M. & Hudson, J. (2005) A standard’s integrity: can it be safeguarded?, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 43(2), pp. 151-155.
https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2005.1391516

eSam (2018) Checklista inför beslut om molntjänster i offentlig sektor, 31 oktober.
https://www.esamverka.se/download/18.1d126bc174ad1e6c39c88c/1542008743030/Checklista%20om%20molntj%C3%A4nster_20181031%20(002).pdf

Ewald, F. (2021) Limbo i molnet – nu behövs krisinsikt hos myndigheterna, Altinget, 2 juli.
https://www.altinget.se/artikel/limbo-i-molnet-nu-behovs-krisinsikt-hos-myndigheterna

Ewald, F. (2021) Myndigheternas tystnad, Dagens Arena, 17 maj.
https://www.dagensarena.se/essa/myndigheternas-tystnad/

Farrell, J. & Klemperer, P. (2007) Coordination and lock-in: Competition with switching costs and network effects, In Armstrong, M. and Porter, R. (Eds.) Handbook of Industrial Organization, Volume 3, Elsevier, pp. 1967-2072.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1573-448X(06)03031-7

Försäkringskassan (2019a) Vitbok – Molntjänster i samhällsbärande verksamhet – risker, lämplighet och vägen framåt, Dnr. 013428-2019, Version 1.0, 18 november.
https://www.forsakringskassan.se/wps/wcm/connect/30cc57bd-b5cd-4e04-94cd-1f7a02a9ae1a/vitbok.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=

Försäkringskassan (2019b) Cloud Services in Sustaining Societal Functions–Risks, Appropriateness and the Way Forward, Swedish Social Insurance Agency, Dnr. 013428-2019, Version 1.0, 18 November.
https://www.forsakringskassan.se/wps/wcm/connect/40c3b54f-05bb-46ea-9112-58f3e3624eba/forsakringskassan-whitepaper-vitbok-english.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=

Gamalielsson, J. & Lundell, B. (2013) Experiences from implementing PDF in open source: challenges and opportunities for standardisation processes, In Jakobs, K. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 8th IEEE Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT 2013), ISBN 3-86130-802-9, IEEE, Piscataway, pp. 39-49.
https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIT.2013.6774572

Gamalielsson, J. & Lundell, B. (2021) On Engagement With ICT Standards and Their Implementations in Open Source Software Projects: Experiences and Insights From the Multimedia Field, International Journal of Standardization Research (IJSR), Vol. 19(1), pp. 1-28.
https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSR.287102

Gamalielsson, J., Lundell, B., Butler, S., Brax, C., Persson, T., Mattsson, A., Gustavsson, T., Feist, J. & Lönroth, E. (2021) Towards open government through open source software for web analytics: the case of Matomo, eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government (JeDEM) (to appear).

GAIA (2019) Project GAIA-X: A Federated Data Infrastructure as the Cradle of a Vibrant European Ecosystem, Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi), Berlin, Oct..
https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/EN/Publikationen/Digitale-Welt/project-gaia-x.html

Hon, W. K., Millard, C. & Walden, I. (2012) Negotiating Cloud Contracts: Looking at Clouds from Both Sides Now, Stanford Technology Law Review, Vol. 16(1), pp. 79-129.

Kammarkollegiet (2016) Open IT-standards, National Procurement Services, Kammarkollegiet, 7 mars, Dnr 96-38-2014.
https://www.avropa.se/globalassets/dokument/open-it-standards.pdf

Kroes, N. (2008) Being Open About Standards. Brussels, 10 June, SPEECH/08/317, European Commissioner for Competition Policy.
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_08_317

Lundell, B. (2011) e-Governance in public sector ICT procurement: what is shaping practice in Sweden?, European Journal of ePractice, Vol. 12(6), pp. 66-78.
http://web.archive.org/web/20110429011729/http://www.epractice.eu/files/European%20Journal%20epractice%20Volume%2012_6.pdf

Lundell, B. (2020) Analys av DIGG:s policy för utveckling av programvara, version 1.0, 20 maj, Skövde University Studies in Informatics 2020:1, ISSN 1653-2325, ISBN: 978-91-983667-6-1, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden.
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-18895

Lundell, B. (2021) Yttrande över betänkandet Säker och kostnadseffektiv IT-drift (SOU 2021:1), Dnr. HS 2021/469, Högskolan i Skövde, Skövde, 7 maj.

Lundell, B. & Gamalielsson, J. (2018) Sustainable digitalisation through different dimensions of openness: how can lock-in, interoperability, and long-term maintenance of IT systems be addressed?, In Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Open Collaboration (OpenSym ‘18), ACM, New York, ISBN: 978-1-4503-5936-8, Article 3, 10p.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3233391.3233527

Lundell B., Gamalielsson, J., Butler, S., Brax, C., Persson, T., Mattsson, A., Gustavsson, T., Feist, J. & Öberg, J. (2021a) Enabling OSS usage through procurement projects: How can lock-in effects be avoided?, In Taibi, D. et al. (Eds.), The 13th International Conference on Open Source Systems (OSS 2021), IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Vol. 624, Springer, Cham, pp. 16-27.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75251-4_2
https://www.oss2021.org/details/oss-2021-papers/1/Enabling-OSS-usage-through-procurement-projects-How-can-lock-in-effects-be-avoided- (pre-print)

Lundell, B., Gamalielsson, J. & Katz, A. (2015) On implementation of Open Standards in software: To what extent can ISO standards be implemented in open source software?, International Journal of Standardization Research, Vol. 13(1), pp. 47-73.
https://dx.doi.org/10.4018/IJSR.2015010103

Lundell, B., Gamalielsson, J. & Katz, A. (2018) On Challenges for Implementing ISO Standards in Software: Can Both Open and Closed Standards Be Implemented in Open Source Software?, In Jakobs, K. (Ed.) Corporate and Global Standardization Initiatives in Contemporary Society, IGI Global, Hershey, ISBN: 978-1-5225-5320-5, pp. 219-251.
https://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5320-5.ch010

Lundell, B., Gamalielsson, J. & Katz, A. (2019) Implementing IT Standards in Software: challenges and recommendations for organisations planning software development covering IT standards, European Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 10(2).
https://ejlt.org/index.php/ejlt/article/view/709/

Lundell, B., Gamalielsson, J. & Katz, A. (2020) Addressing lock-in effects in the public sector: how can organisations deploy a SaaS solution while maintaining control of their digital assets?, In Virkar, S. et al. (Eds.) CEUR Workshop Proceedings: EGOV-CeDEM-ePart 2020, Vol-2797, ISSN 1613-0073, pp. 289-296.
http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2797/paper28.pdf

Lundell, B., Gamalielsson, J., Katz, A. & Lindroth, M. (2021b) Perceived and Actual Lock-in Effects Amongst Swedish Public Sector Organisations when Using a SaaS Solution, In Scholl, H. J. et al. (Eds.) EGOV 2021: Electronic Government, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 12850, Springer, Cham, pp. 59-72.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84789-0_5

Lundell, B., Gamalielsson, J. & Tengblad, S. (2016) IT-standarder, inlåsning och konkurrens: En analys av policy och praktik inom svensk förvaltning, Uppdragsforskningsrapport 2016:2, Konkurrensverket, ISSN: 1652-8089.
http://www.konkurrensverket.se/globalassets/publikationer/uppdragsforskning/forsk_rapport_2016-2.pdf

Lundell, B., Gamalielsson, J., Tengblad, S., Hooshyar Yousefi, B., Fischer, T., Johansson, G., Rodung, R., Mattsson, A., Oppmark, J., Gustavsson, T., Feist, J., Landemoo, S. & Lönroth, E. (2017) Addressing lock-in, interoperability, and long-term maintenance challenges through Open Source: How can companies strategically use Open Source?, In Balaguer et al. (Eds.) The 13th International Conference on Open Source Systems (OSS 2017), IFIP AICT 496, Springer, pp. 80-88.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57735-7_9

Lundell, B., Lings, B. & Lindqvist, E. (2006) Perceptions and Uptake of Open Source in Swedish Organisations, In Damiani, E. (Eds.) Open Source Systems: OSS 2006, IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Vol 203, Springer, Boston, pp. 155-163.
https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34226-5_15

Opara-Martins, J., Sahandi, R. & Tian, F. (2016) Critical analysis of vendor lock-in and its impact on cloud computing migration: a business perspective, Journal of Cloud Computing, Vol. 5(4), pp. 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-016-0054-z

Pensionsmyndigheten (2015) Molntjänster i staten: en ny generation av outsourcing, Pensionsmyndigheten. https://www.pensionsmyndigheten.se/content/dam/pensionsmyndigheten/blanketter—broschyrer—faktablad/publikationer/svar-p%C3%A5-regeringsuppdrag/2016/Uppdrag%20att%20analysera%20potentialen%20f%C3%B6r%20anv%C3%A4ndning%20av%20molntj%C3%A4nster%20i%20staten%20.pdf

Regeringen (2009) Delegation för e-förvaltning, Dir. 2009:19, Regeringen, 26 mars.
https://www.regeringen.se/49bb46/contentassets/ee432a087a2246b8832705e303da1216/delegation-for-e-forvaltning-dir.-200919

Regeringen (2019) Säker och kostnadseffektiv it-drift för den offentliga förvaltningen, Kommittédirektiv, Dir. 2019:64, Infrastrukturdepartementet, Regeringen, 26 september.
https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/kommittedirektiv/2019/09/dir.-201964/

Regeringskansliet (2021a) Remiss av SOU 2021:1 Säker och kostnadseffektiv it-drift, Diarienummer: I2021/00342, Publicerad 3 februari, Senast uppdaterad 11 maj.
https://www.regeringen.se/remisser/2021/02/remiss-sou-20211-it-driftsutredningens-delbetankande-saker-och-kostnadseffektiv-it-drift–rattsliga-forutsattningar-for-utkontraktering/

Regeringskansliet (2021b) It-driftsutredningens delbetänkande Säker och kostnadseffektiv it-drift – rättsliga förutsättningar för utkontraktering, SOU 2021:1: Remissinstanser, Infrastrukturdepartementet, Dnr. I2021/00342, 2 februari.
https://www.regeringen.se/49009b/contentassets/af0e2dfe90254ac4b2fe297cd1232299/remissinstanser-for-sou-20211-it-driftsutredningens-delbetankande-saker-och-kostnadseffektiv-it-drift–rattsliga-forutsattningar-for-utkontraktering.pdf

Sambruk (2020) Digital signering, https://sambruk.se/portfolio/digital-signering/

Skatteverket & Kronofogden (2021) Promemoria om ersättning av Skype i Skatteverkets och Kronofogdens verksamhet, Beslut, Skatteverket, Dnr. (Skatteverket): 8-958696, Dnr. (Kronofogden): KFM 10419–2021, 3 maj.
https://www.skatteverket.se/omoss/varverksamhet/rapporterremissvarochskrivelser/remissvar/2021/remissvar2021/8958696.5.3016b5d91791bf54679d41.html

SOU (2015) En förvaltning som håller ihop, Slutbetänkande från E-delegationen, Statens Offentliga Utredningar, SOU 2015:66, Stockholm, ISBN 978-91-38-24322-0.
http://www.regeringen.se/rattsdokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2015/06/sou-201566/

SOU (2021) Säker och kostnadseffektiv it-drift – rättsliga förutsättningar för utkontraktering, Delbetänkande av It-driftsutredningen, Statens Offentliga Utredningar, SOU 2021:1, Stockholm, ISBN 978-91-525-0001-9.
https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2021/01/sou-20211/